Attacks blocked or retained-quarantined
SABER-inspired live campaignA score without context is not evidence.
HOM publishes protocols, denominators, artifacts, and limits alongside its numbers. Historical results remain available for reproduction without pretending they are permanent release guarantees.
Published papers
One protocol.
Two publication layers.
MutMem introduces the authorized-mutation protocol and empirical evidence. MutMem V2 closes the portable-verification and clean-install reproduction gap.
SEPTEMBER 2026 / MUTMEM V2
Portable verification and reproducible evidence.
Exact canonical bytes, versioned schemas, closed failure reasons, independent Node and Python agreement, production conformance, and clean-install reproduction.
Read arXiv:2609.01235AUGUST 2026 / MUTMEMCryptographically authorized mutation in persistent agent memory.
Retention-preserving cognitive change, signed outcome evidence, portable verification, utility evaluation, mutation integrity, and poisoning adaptation.
Read arXiv:2608.02843Historical publication snapshot
Retained for comparison.
Not a version lock.
These MutMem V2 results are preserved by the current repository as dated research records. They are distinct protocols and are not averaged.
ProtocolQuestionRun boundaryRetained result
LongMemEvalLong-horizon retrieval utility500 questions · LLM judged459/500 · 91.8%
LoCoMoLong-conversation memory1,986 questions · LLM judged1,472/1,986 · 74.12%
PoisonedRAGTargeted retrieval poisoningPaired N=100 protocol0/100 · 94/100 bypassed
Mutation integrityUnauthorized state changeSeven rejection cases7/7 rejected
01
Current operational evidence
Release evidence extends beyond the historical utility snapshot.
Benign false positives
No indeterminate outcomesExact fixed-corpus graph rows
Reconstructed Graph G2 proofMutMem
Cognition may move.
The record remains.
The MutMem research line studies how memory usefulness can change as new evidence arrives while retaining the original observation and making the transition independently verifiable.
Earlier evidenceOriginal state retained
New evidenceWeight transition signed
Both states remain inspectableReading the claim correctly
Integrity is not
omniscience.
AIMOS can verify authority, retained bytes, ordering, and transitions. It cannot establish the factual truth of an authorized assertion.
Who asserted what.
Identity, origin, ordering, and cryptographic continuity can be reconstructed from retained evidence.
How memory was used.
Receipts and policy evidence show what the system admitted, recalled, changed, or denied.
Whether the assertion was true.
Authenticated-but-false information remains a named failure class, not a problem hidden by signatures.
Independent scrutiny
Read the method.
Challenge the result.
The repository preserves source, evidence manifests, release checks, and reproduction material.